<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lessons Learned in Communication</title>
	<atom:link href="http://progressblog.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=5" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://progressblog.com/?p=5</link>
	<description>Thoughts on personal &#38; organizational change</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 18:22:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lech</title>
		<link>http://progressblog.com/?p=5&#038;cpage=1#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Lech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 03:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://progressblog.com/?p=5#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Thank you for commenting!
A great article - thanks for sharing too!
One of my colleagues calls those endless threads &quot;chats&quot;. It&#039;s often hard to find a tangible result (value) when one of those starts.
An interesting strategy. I sometimes turn Outlook to cached mode myself, making it check e-mail regularly at assigned intervals (productivity gains too). Sooner or later, however, someone sends something very urgent...
Did you ever regret following such a strategy? Did it become your standard indeed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for commenting!<br />
A great article &#8211; thanks for sharing too!<br />
One of my colleagues calls those endless threads &#8220;chats&#8221;. It&#8217;s often hard to find a tangible result (value) when one of those starts.<br />
An interesting strategy. I sometimes turn Outlook to cached mode myself, making it check e-mail regularly at assigned intervals (productivity gains too). Sooner or later, however, someone sends something very urgent&#8230;<br />
Did you ever regret following such a strategy? Did it become your standard indeed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lech</title>
		<link>http://progressblog.com/?p=5&#038;cpage=1#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Lech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 03:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://progressblog.com/?p=5#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Thank you for commenting!
A great article - thanks for sharing too!
One of my colleagues calls those endless threads &quot;chats&quot;. It&#039;s often hard to find a tangible result (value) when one of those starts.
An interesting strategy. I sometimes turn Outlook to cached mode myself, making it check e-mail regularly at assigned intervals (productivity gains too). Sooner or later, however, someone sends something very urgent...
Did you ever regret following such a strategy? Did it become your standard indeed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for commenting!<br />
A great article &#8211; thanks for sharing too!<br />
One of my colleagues calls those endless threads &#8220;chats&#8221;. It&#8217;s often hard to find a tangible result (value) when one of those starts.<br />
An interesting strategy. I sometimes turn Outlook to cached mode myself, making it check e-mail regularly at assigned intervals (productivity gains too). Sooner or later, however, someone sends something very urgent&#8230;<br />
Did you ever regret following such a strategy? Did it become your standard indeed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PM Hut</title>
		<link>http://progressblog.com/?p=5&#038;cpage=1#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>PM Hut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 18:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://progressblog.com/?p=5#comment-20</guid>
		<description>F2F communication is indeed the best (I have published an article about it, &lt;a href=&#039;http://www.pmhut.com/the-join-up-meeting-the-best-mean-of-project-communication&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the join-up meeting&lt;/a&gt;), as for email, the potential of misunderstandings is quite high, that&#039;s why it&#039;s always good to follow up with an email. There&#039;s also the issue where email threads drag on forever. My strategy is to answer emails near the end of the day, this way I will avoid these endless (and nearly always useless) threads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>F2F communication is indeed the best (I have published an article about it, <a href='http://www.pmhut.com/the-join-up-meeting-the-best-mean-of-project-communication' rel="nofollow">the join-up meeting</a>), as for email, the potential of misunderstandings is quite high, that&#8217;s why it&#8217;s always good to follow up with an email. There&#8217;s also the issue where email threads drag on forever. My strategy is to answer emails near the end of the day, this way I will avoid these endless (and nearly always useless) threads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
